The Bible is Not the Word of God

Jason Micheli —  September 16, 2014 — 6 Comments

Untitled101111I’ve become convinced that its important for the Church to inoculate our young people with a healthy dose of catechesis before we ship them off to college, just enough so that when they first hear about Nietzsche or really study Darwin they won’t freak out and presume that what the Church taught them in 6th grade confirmation is the only wisdom the Church has to offer.

I’ve been working on writing a catechism, a distillation of the faith into concise questions and answers with brief supporting scriptures that could be the starting point for a conversation.

You can find the previous posts here.

3. (How) Is the Bible the Word of God?

The Bible is the Word of God in that scripture- when proclaimed rightly and received faithfully- is the reliable testimony to the one Word of God, Jesus Christ who is the logic of God made flesh.

So when Christians use the term ‘the Word of God’ they’re actually referring to multiple forms whose authority and ‘infallibility’ varies by degrees.

Imagine, for instance, the image of three concentric circles.

At the center, in the inner, centermost circle, is the Logos, the eternal Word of God that was made flesh in Jesus Christ.

Christ is the only capital ‘W’ word of God in which Christians believe and after which Christians conform their lives.

Next in the trio is the testimony to the Word of God given to us by Israel, the prophets and the Church. This testimony to the Word of God is the word we call scripture.

In the final, outermost, circle is the word of God as its proclaimed and interpreted in the worship and ministry of the Church to which Christians will often reply: ‘This is the word of the God for the people of God/Thanks be to God.’

The only true, literal, infallible, eternal Word of God then is Jesus Christ, the Logos of God.

The bible is the word of God in that it points us to the one Word of God, Jesus Christ.

Our reading and preaching of scripture is- or perhaps more apt, becomes– the word of God for us only when it faithfully proclaims and embodies the one Word of God, Jesus Christ.

“Many other signs therefore Jesus also performed in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these have been written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.” – John 20.30-31

4. Should We Interpret the Bible Literally?

The form of the scripture text should determine how you interpret scripture.

If the scripture text is poetic, then you should it interpret it poetically. Metaphorically.

If the scripture text is exhortative, then you better go and do whatever it says. Whatever is the best modern-day equivalent of what it says.

If the scripture text is parabolic, then you should scratch your head and look for the scandal of the Gospel. Or whatever would be likewise scandalous in our day.

If the scripture text is fabulous, then you should dig for the deeper meaning, the text’s artist seeks to show rather than simply tell. e.g., Garden of Eden.

But when Christians refer to the bible as the word of God, don’t forget that while Christianity is indeed a revealed religion, the revelation of the Word of God is a mediated revelation.

Our access to the Logos comes to us only by way of scripture and the Church. Scripture therefore is not revelation. The pages and printed words in your bible are not, in and of themselves, the Word of God. They are our testimony to God’s Word as its been disclosed to Israel and the Church. Because of that testimony, scripture is authoritative for us and it is sufficient for communicating all we need to know of and follow this God.

At the same time, one’s testimony is never identical with the person of whom one testifies. Scripture’s testimony can only partially and provisionally capture the mystery of the eternal Word.

None of this threatening should be threatening, however, because the Word of God, Jesus Christ, is a mediated revelation.

Testimony can be imperfect without jeopardizing the perfection of the One to whom scripture testifies.

In other words, the bible does not (always) need to be interpreted literally because we do not believe in the bible; we believe in the One to whom the bible testifies. We worship Jesus Christ not the bible.

And, it should be pointed out, Jesus himself did not interpret scripture literally:

I say “You are gods,

sons of the Most High, all of you;

nevertheless, you shall die like mortals

and fall like any prince” (Psalm 82 vv. 6-7)

 

Jason Micheli

Posts

6 responses to The Bible is Not the Word of God

  1. Forgive not knowing book or chapter off the top of my head, but the verse major context” spare the rod spoil the child. ” to me that is not a literal translation. How would you interpret it.

    • It’s in Proverbs, which doesn’t really lend itself to anything but literal translations. That’s my problem with Proverbs; it just reads your like mom nagging you to clean up after yourself, do your homework etc. But Proverbs doesn’t purport to be anything other than a collection of aphorisms attributed- not to God- but to King Solomon. So I think some can be helpful and illuminating when read in submission to Christ while others (like that one you cited) are clearly the product of a time and culture not our own.

    • While “spare the rod, spoil the child” is not actually found in scripture at all – not in proverbs, not anywhere – there are many verses in proverbs that talk about the benefits of using a rod on children. I don’t think it takes too much to see how these verses can be read in a metaphorical sense – Hebrews 12 in the New Testament quotes some of them and jumps right into a metaphorical disseration on them, talking about how God disciplines his sons. Now, I don’t know about you, but I’ve never had God smack me with a literal rod – so this is definitely not literal. The writer of Hebrews talks about the Lord’s *rebuke* being a rod – “do not faint when you are rebuked by Him.” That is one form of viewing a rod in a metaphorical way.

  2. Good job, Jason.

    Yeah the Proverbs should always be considered “inspired” like all of Scripture but the decision you have to make is whether they are abstractly sacrosanct (like the way Texas displays the Ten Commandments in their government buildings) or whether they are practical advice given with a theological agenda in one movement relative to the particular covenant the Jews have with YHVH. One is abstract and the other is not. I would say They the Psalms cannot be abstract in the way modernists want to read them (because you can’t and take seriously the very clear Barthian bent this article has).

    The point of the verse, to me, seems to make more sense in light of its inferred covenant theology. Disciplining your children is essential. A spanking will not kill them. this is not making spanking sacrosanct but it is acknowledging the greater sin of forsaking the covenant. Of course, “the ends justify the means” can be read out of this; but I think if you emphasize it’s theological content, you see the wisdom– it’s better to cut out your eye than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.

  3. Doctrine that leads us to worship Scripture inappropriately is the theological equivalent of worshipping the angel (messenger) who brought Mary the good news of her pregnancy. All throughout Scripture there are people who wrestle with their pagan world when angels (messengers) appear. IE a frequent utterance of angels in their first moments of interacting with humans is “do not be afraid” or “I’m just the messenger. Please don’t worship me.”

  4. Proverbs (not Psalms. Sorry)

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*