75% of the children in the Highlands under 7 years old are critically malnourished.
Hearing that stat my first thought, perhaps oddly, was peace.
The scriptures declare that God’s vision and promise to us is shalom, which is usually translated as “peace.”
It’s meaning, however, is much richer than what is conveyed by our English word.
Shalom means wholeness, healing, justice, and righteousness, equality, unity, freedom, and community. Shalom is a vision of all people whole, well, and one, and of all nature whole, well, and one.
According to United Methodist Bishops it is “the sum total of moral and spiritual qualities in a community whose life is in harmony with God’s good creation.” They specifically relate Jesus’ ministry to the gift of shalom and affirm, “New Testament faith presupposes a radical break between the follies, or much so-called conventional wisdom about power and security, on the one hand, and the transcendent wisdom of shalom, on the other.”
The book of Revelation imagines the completion of human history and the full realization of God’s redemptive purpose for the world in terms of “a new heaven and a new earth.” Its visionary author, John of Patmos, described when God would be with and among human beings.
“He will wipe every tear from their eyes. Death will be no more; mourning and crying and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed away’ [Revelation 21:1-3].
John seems to have in mind the words of Isaiah:
For I am about to create new heavens and a new earth; the former things shall not be remembered or come to mind… I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and delight in my people; no more shall the sound of weeping be heard in it, or the cry of distress. No more shall there be in it an infant that lives but a few days, or an old person who does not live out a lifetime; …They shall build houses and inhabit them; they shall plant vineyards and eat their fruit.
They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands. They shall not labor in vain, or bear children for calamity; for they shall be offspring blessed by the Lord—and their descendants as well…
The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, the lion shall eat straw like the ox; but the serpent—its food shall be dust! They shall not hurt or destroy on all my holy mountain, says the Lord [Isaiah 65: 17-25].
One can only imagine how these words must sound to the millions in our world today who labor to build houses for others, but whose earnings enable them only to live in homes of scrap metal and cardboard.
Who work fields owned by others, the harvest of which is shipped to another, wealthier land while they most scavenge for food in landfills.
Whose children will die with bloated bellies before they see adulthood.
The gospel of the Kingdom of God, the gospel that proclaims the promise of shalom, is surely good news for the poor.
But what is it for us? Is it message one of woe?
“But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep [Luke 6:21-25].
It need not be. Matthew 25: 31-46 is typically identified as “the judgment of the nations” or “the last judgment.” It speaks of “the Son of Man” coming in glory with the angels, sitting on his throne with all the nations gathered before him.
It is judgment because it envisions sheep being divided from goats. The sheep will go to the right, the goats to the left. To those on his right, the King says,
““Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” But those on the left: “You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”
And what was the difference between the sheep and the goats, those who gained entrance to the kingdom and those shut out? Simply, their response to the poor and oppressed determined the judgment.
Of course, the judge first expressed the matter in terms of their response to his need.
“For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.” Both the saved and the damned professed ignorance. ““Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison?”
““Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.”
Is it a mistake to suggest that our salvation hinges on our response to the crises like the aforementioned stat?